VOLUNTARY EXTRA PRACTICE

The practice asks questions on understanding of historic American documents. The suggested answers are not comprehensive; they are ideas that could be of use in creative writing.

 

READ ABUT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

 

1. “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

 

1a. Does the Declaration of Independence concern only males? [Idea]

1b. Does the Declaration require religious adherence for human rights? [Idea]

1c. Is the Pursuit of Happiness a term of legal systematics? [Idea]

 

2. “The History of the present King of Great-Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World.”

 

2a. Who was the English king? [Idea]

2b. How can we sum up the causes for the Declaration? [Idea]

 

3. WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.

 

3a. Does the Declaration solicit a divine intervention? [Idea]

3b. Do we say the United States is, or the United States are? [Idea]

 

READ ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION

 

4. WE, the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES, in order to…

 

4a. How can we compare the words order and people, if we look to the Constitution and the Great Seal? [Idea]

4b. How can we relate the content of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? [Idea]

 

5. The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

 

5a. How can we interpret the phrase habeas corpus? [Idea]

5b. What is the origin and application of the phrase habeas corpus? [Idea]

 

Let us consider word sense, in the following passages from the Constitution. The boldface has the matters of special focus.

 

6. “No bill of attainder, or ex post facto law, shall be passed.” [Idea]

 

7. “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the United States;” [Idea]

 

8. “… he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices;” [Idea]

 

9. “… and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” [Idea]

 

READ ABOUT THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND FURTHER AMENDMENTS

 

10. How can we compare the guidelines for legal practice, in Amendment 6 and Magna Carta? [Idea]

 

(Amendment 6) “In all Criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district …”

 

(Magna Carta) “No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land …”

 

11. How could we paraphrase Amendment 4 with the Infinitive? [Idea]

 

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

12. How could we paraphrase the verb shall in Amendment 6? [Idea]

 

“In all Criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”

 

13. How can we comprehend the word enumeration in Amendment 9? [Idea]

 

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

 

Answers

1a. Obviously, the Declaration did not introduce a separate or unequal status for women. The word man alone denotes human kind. The plural, men, means human beings, not human kinds. The use comes from classic Latin translations. To refer to a male, the noun man requires an article or a determiner as a, the, or this. Examples: Man belongs with the Homo sapiens. The man can read. [Back]

 

1b. No, it absolutely does not. The Declaration states that all people are equal in human rights and monarchy is not a work of deity (saying also, “the separate and equal Station). The document addresses the royalist belief, into a divine right to rule. [Back]

 

1c. No, the Declaration never was meant to set out legislation. The document also says, “Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable”, and it never was meant to make laws for suffering. The Declaration remains the most famous document to invoke human happiness, within the law, among the incentives to form a country. [Back]

 

2a. The monarch was George III of the house of Hanover. Often remembered as “Mad King George”, reported by some British resources as ill with porphyria, the king personally decided on policies for America. [Back]

 

2b. George III disabled administration and justice in America. People were forced to give up on political representation, to obtain civilian status. The royalist military took local residents captive, exploited the land and the people, and were not held responsible. [Back]

 

3a. No, it does not. The definite article in the phrase “appealing for the Rectitude of our Intentions” says the Causes are righteous. A phrase as appealing for _ rectitude might have such implications. It does not occur. [Back]

 

3b. The phrase the United States is expresses a unitary concept for a country, as for Germany or France, for example. The phrase the United States are summons up the idea of the country by the people and for the people. USA constituent states have considerable autonomy. Both phrases are grammatically correct. [Back]

 

4a. Word sense changes over time and the word people may help show it. The noun is derived from the Latin populus. It did not connote nationality in ancient times and often referred to laying waste or degrading: perpopulor, to devastate, pillage; populabilis, destructible. Ancient Rome was a militarist culture oriented to status.

 

Nowadays, the noun people means a group of human beings, or a nationality. As a group, it takes a plural verb: The people here all speak English. As a nationality or ethnicity, the noun may take on the plural itself: The peoples of Europe have formed a Union.

 

The word order also comes from Latin. It could mean a rank, group, or a class of people. Cicero’s Philippics have many examples. We use the phrase in order to when we want to tell why or for what purpose something or someone is. In the sense of a group or type, the word ordo did not have to bring associations with an arrangement, as in a line or queue.

 

The language of the Constitution is modern American English. The document opens with the phrase We, the people, meaning the people of the United States of America. The language of the Great Seal mottos is ancient Latin. It has the phrase Novus Ordo Seclorum, which can be comprehended as A New People Come, that is, a new nation has come into existence. Feel welcome to read A new people come. [Back]

 

4b. The Constitution addresses the issues named in the Declaration: establishes the legislative (Article 1), the executive (Article 2), as well as the judiciary (Article 3). It provides against absolutism, instituting impeachment from office. It limits potential by royalist or foreign influence, requiring of the Head of State to be a born American citizen, elected President in free elections. The maximum of two terms of four years in office discourages attempts at hereditary government. Article 4 guarantees a republican form of government, and Article 6 declares the Constitution the binding law of the land, denying the idea of a divine right to govern: no religious tests are allowed as qualifications for an office. Article 7 predicts ratification for adopting constitutional legislation. [Back]

 

5a. The phrase derives from a larger fragment, habeas corpus ad subjiciendum, dated on the English king Edward I. The writ ordered detainee cases to be evaluated in courts of law, with the persons present, to prevent indeterminate incarceration. The fragment is a Latin subjunctive and can be interpreted as (so) that you have the person in court. Similar phrases: habeas corpus ad respondendum, for the detainee to answer in proceedings; habeas corpus ad testificandum, for the detainee to testify. Nowadays, these are the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to guide administration of justice. [Back]

 

5b. The Habeas Corpus Parliament passed The Habeas Corpus Act in 1679, during the reign of Charles II. Habeas corpus is effective in the USA, England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Most countries have equivalent legislation, such as the Criminal Procedure Act in Scotland, or article 40.4 of the 1937 Irish Constitution. The European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5, says, “Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.” [Back]

 

6. The word attainder comes from the French atteindre, to reach, hit. The bills allowed punishment without trial. They were banned as violating the principle of separation of powers. We may compare Montesquieu on the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary.

 

The Latin word factum meant a deed, act, or exploit. Retroactivity, as ex post facto laws are also called, is forbidden in the USA. Legality of an act may not be disputed with use of regulations adopted after the fact. [Back]

 

7. There have been disputes in the US over the scope of presidential military command. Obviously, in case of a war, it would not honor the civilian authority to have the president the rank of a corporal. However, in the Constitution, the phrase “when called into the actual service of the United States” would be redundant, should the command belong with the President simply as In Office.

 

The Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wrote, “The propriety of admitting the president to be commander in chief, so far as to give orders, and have a general superintendency, was admitted. But it was urged, that it would be dangerous to let him command in person, without any restraint, as he might make a bad use of it. The consent of both houses of Congress ought, therefore, to be required, before he should take the actual command.”

 

Justice Robert Cooper Grier stated: “The President is not only authorized but bound to resist force by force. He does not initiate the war, but is bound to accept the challenge without waiting for any special legislative authority.” [Back]

 

8. The personal pronoun he remains is legal use for both genders. Here, it is an anaphora to refer to the President. Anaphoras refer back in discourse: “When called into the actual service, the President becomes Commander-in-Chief. He may require the opinion …”

 

Let us compare Article 5 of the European Convention: “Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty …”

 

Modern linguistics proposes the forms he or she as well as s/he for short, to avoid anaphoric ambiguity. [Back]

 

9. The President has the right to pardon even capital punishment convicts. The limitation on impeachment is to prevent royalist practices that appointed irremovable officials. [Back]

 

10. Magna Carta does not say that detention is justifiable in criminal cases only. It also has forms of punishment that American codes reject, such as exile or mutilation. The Carta does not state that judgment requires lawyers, and the laws of the land do not provide for a proper place of judgment.

 

The Declaration describes, among the Causes, “FOR depriving us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury: FOR transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offences. The Declaration adds, HE has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.” The Carta never gave the idea as well as ideal for the Amendments. Read about the Bill of Rights. [Back]

 

11. The people have the right to be inviolably secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no Warrants are to be issued, unless upon a probable cause to be supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly to describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [Back]

 

12. In all Criminal prosecutions, the law warrants a speedy and public trial for the accused, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime occurs; the law requires that the judiciary is identified by the administrative, the accused to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, to be confronted with the witnesses against him, to have witnesses in his favor, and to have legal Counsel for his defense. [Back]

 

13. The word enumeration comes from Latin. Latin numerals were letters of the alphabet. For example, X meant 10, XX meant 20. Nowadays also, enumeration does not have to mean digits. It often means naming, presenting.

 

The Founders realized the Constitution did not name all possible rights and it was impracticable for it to make all regulations. The Amendment says the fact a matter is presented (enumerated) in the Constitution does not make it more important than other rights the people have; the fact a particular right is not in the Constitution does not mean it belongs under federal powers. [Back]

 

Advertisements

THE CONSTITUTION

A government of our own is our natural right: And when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human affairs, he will become convinced, that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a cool deliberate manner, while we have it in our power, than to trust such an interesting event to time and chance.
Thomas Paine, Common Sense
JUMP TO INSPIRATION WITH THOMAS PAINE.

 

Members of the Constitutional Convention signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Constitution became effective in year 1789.
JUMP TO THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION

 

The Constitution was written on parchment, signed, and then printed for approval by the several States and their inhabitants.
JUMP TO THE PARCHMENT
JUMP TO CARTER PRINT

 

It has been about 230 years, since the Constitution was written. Today, most people interpret “chusing” as “choosing”, “controul” as “control”, and speakers of American English would think “honor” and “behavior”, rather than “honour” and “behaviour”. Present day prints of the Constitution also vary in their uses of big letters, or punctuation.

 

It does not mean the people or prints change the content. Our text as well, does not re-invent the Constitution. It combines the parchment and the print, and brings the form to the standard of today, yet takes all the language uses from the Constitution itself.
JUMP TO THE NOTES

 

Part 3 of our grammar course invites work on the grammatical article, definite and indefinite, along with nouns, adjectives, and adverbs. Part 4 welcomes exercise in phrases and clauses. We use the United States civics for that: they have good syntax.
EMOTICON: SMILE

 

The United States Constitution in modern American English

We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

ARTICLE I.

 

Section 1. All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

 

Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several States, and the electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State Legislature.

 

No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty-five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

 

Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons. The actual enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to choose three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

 

When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive authority thereof shall issue writs of election, to fill such vacancies.

 

The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other officers, and shall have the sole power of impeachment.

 

Section 3. The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote.

 

Immediately after they shall be assembled in consequence of the first election, they shall be divided, as equally as may be, into three classes. The seats of the Senators of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the second year, of the second class at the expiration of the fourth year, and of the third class at the expiration of the sixth year, so that one third may be chosen every second year; and if vacancies happen, by resignation or otherwise, during the recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary appointments until the next meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such vacancies.

 

No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

 

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.

 

The Senate shall choose their other officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of President of the United States.

 

The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside; and no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present.

 

Judgment, in cases of impeachment, shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States; but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, according to law.

 

Section 4. The times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.

 

The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

 

Section 5. Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties, as each House may provide.

 

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.

 

Each House shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may in their judgment require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the members of either House on any question shall, at the desire of one-fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.

 

Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

 

Section 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.

 

No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased, during such time; and no person holding any office under the United States shall be a member of either House, during his continuance in office.

 

Section 7. All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments, as on other bills.

 

Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approves, he shall sign it; but if not, he shall return it, with his objections, to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such reconsideration two-thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that House, it shall become a law. But in all such cases the votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.

 

Every order, resolution, or vote to which the concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and, before the same shall take effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the rules and limitations prescribed in the case of a bill.

 

Section 8. The Congress shall have power:

 

To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

 

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

 

To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;

 

To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the United States;

 

To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

 

To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;

 

To establish post offices and post roads;

 

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

 

To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

 

To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

 

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

 

To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;

 

To provide and maintain a navy;

 

To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;

 

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions;

 

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by the Congress;

 

To exercise exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States and acceptance of the Congress, become the seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings; — And,

 

To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

 

Section 9. The migration or importation of such persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight; but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.

 

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

 

No bill of attainder, or ex post facto law, shall be passed.

 

No capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

 

No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any State.

 

No preference shall be given, by any regulation of commerce or revenue, to ports of one State over those of another; nor shall vessels bound to, or from one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay duties in another.

 

No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

 

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign State.

 

Section 10. No State shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

 

No State shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any State on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the Congress.

 

No State shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another State, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

 

ARTICLE II.

 

Section 1. The Executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected as follows:

 

Each State shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of Electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

 

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each, which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, then from the five highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each State having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the States, and a majority of all the States shall be necessary to a choice. In every case, after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, the Senate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President.

 

The Congress may determine the time of choosing the Electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes, which day shall be the same throughout the United States.

 

No person, except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

 

In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President; and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation, or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

 

The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States, or any of them.

 

Before he enters on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:

 

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

 

Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the Executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices; and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

 

He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint Ambassadors, other public ministers, and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law. But the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers as they think proper, in the President alone, in courts of law, or in heads of departments.

 

The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.

 

Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the Union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.

 

Section 4. The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

 

ARTICLE III.

 

Section 1. The Judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. Judges, both of the Supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

 

Section 2. The Judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; to all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers, and Consuls; to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; to controversies to which the United States shall be a party; to controversies between two or more States, between a State and citizens of another State, between citizens of different States, between citizens of the same State claiming lands under grants of different States, and between a State, or the citizens thereof, and foreign States, citizens or subjects.

 

In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

 

The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.

 

Section 3. Treason, against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

 

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture, except during the life of the person attainted.

 

ARTICLE IV.

 

Section 1. Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.

 

Section 2. Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States.

 

A person charged in any State with treason, felony, or other crime, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another State, shall, on demand of the Executive authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having jurisdiction of the crime.

 

No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.

 

Section 3. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by a junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned, as well as of the Congress.

 

The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed, as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

 

Section 4. The United States shall guarantee, to every State in this Union, a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion, and, on application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.

 

ARTICLE V.

 

The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution; or, on the application of the Legislatures of two-thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three-fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress: Provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses, in the ninth section of the first article; and that no State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

 

ARTICLE VI.

 

All debts contracted, and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

 

This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

 

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and members of the several State Legislatures, and all Executive and Judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, under the United States.

 

ARTICLE VII.

 

The ratification of the Conventions of nine States shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the same.

 

Done in Convention, by the unanimous consent of the States present, the seventeenth day of September, in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven, and of the independence of the United States of America the twelfth.

 

Notes to the modern American English text

The United States Senate offers a transcript of the Constitution.
US SENATE, THE CONSTITUTION
Transcripts present the text as it was written, but they do not require repeating the content in exact same form. We can draw conclusions.

 

We can relate the grammatical articles, definite and indefinite, to semantic categories and types. We may regard the definite article as akin to the Greek τώς, meaning “in this wise” (please see Perseus).

 

A semantic category might embrace a type:
We, the people of the United States…

 

The type, the people of the United States, would belong with a wider notion, that of people generally. Our semantic category here can be the human being, homo sapiens.

 

Classic grammar guidance, as it was 230 years ago and still happens to be today, has tended to regard the articles structurally.

 

When we want to expand our phrases with the particle of, classic grammar would favor the definite article, unless we are clearly unspecific:
those bound to service for a term of years…

 

Accordingly, the Constitution would have a clause as
No preference shall be given, by any regulation of commerce or revenue, to the ports of one State over those of another;

 

Modern American English is more generative. A phrase as
the ports of a State
might imply we select from
ports of a State.

 

In simple words, the phrasing may suggest there is a type of ports to choose from; by comparison, it is not all territory that US authorities own (in Article VI):
The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States.

 

We may compare another phrasing in the Constitution:
nor shall vessels bound to, or from one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay duties in another.
The sense for both ports and vessels is that of a set, not type.

 

The classic, phrasal idea — to use the definite article the in phrases with the possessive of — will fail in matters as everyday and usual as telling about a son/ daughter of, or the son/ daughter of.

 

Example: A son of a smith
I hear you’re looking for someone good to take care of the horseshoes.
Meet John,
a true son of a smith.

 

Our set here is open:
a true son of a smith
would mean
a person with a talent for metalworking.

 

Example: The son of a smith
All Tom’s boys have gone different walks,
only Mark is
the true son of a smith.

 

Our set here is closed:
Mark is one of a specific set of people, here, a family.
Let us mind, closing a set is as closing an association:
it does not mean prescribing on the number of members
(we do not have to count the sons or daughters of the smith,
and the Smiths remain the Smiths, also when they have another kid).
EMOTICON: SMILE

*****

We can join our perceptions on the articles with those on big or small letters, that is, capitalization.

 

Let us think about our rationale for spellings as the House of Representatives, the Senate, or the Supreme Court.

 

If we said it is for a highlight or respect, we would be highlighting or respecting Nazis, or Adolf Hitler, for example.

 

If we said it is for the specific geographic locality, a phrase as the Congress is not in session would not make sense: the Capitol Hill itself cannot debate, anyway.

 

Let us compare.

The Congress shall have power to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.

 

When the talk is about a body of people at work, we use big letters. When it is the work itself we speak or write about, we can stay with the regular, small letter.

 

To close a set, we can have the form of government for our regard (Greek politeia), along with Montesquieu’s TRIPARTITE GOVERNMENTAL POWER, as the power to make laws, the power to put the laws to work, and the power to judge if the laws work well.

 

We can close our set with regard to politeia, and spell the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judiciary.

 

We can compare Amendment XI:
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit, in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another State, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign State.

 

Parchment and print, let us return to Article IV, Section 2.
The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States.

 

Today, a phrase as the citizens of a State would be likely interpreted as “some citizens”.

 

We can compare the phrase, we the people, where people generally, or people in the world entire can be our category. A phrase as “citizens of the world” could be only a figure of speech, however.

 

Further, being a citizen of a State equals being a citizen of the United States, which always was the original idea, and has had further expression in Amendment XIV, Section 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

 

Importantly, American English was becoming more generative already at the time the Constitution was being written and printed.

 

Let us compare Article III, Section 2:
The Judicial power shall extend (…) to controversies between a State and citizens of another State; between citizens of different States; between citizens of the same State claiming lands under grants of different States; and between a State, or the citizens thereof, and foreign States, citizens, or subjects.

 

For the only use of the definite article, in the phrase, or the citizens thereof, we may compare the use of the definite article for the tripartite form of governmental power, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judiciary.

 

Article IV Section 2 does not imply varied recognition for member States, or actually invoke State political authorities at all, hence
Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States.

 

Let us compare a syntactically identical context, in Article III, Section 1, where the classic and phrasal definite article before the noun judges also might suggest choice from within a set today, therefore:
Judges, both of the Supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior…

 

To paraphrase, we would say all judges ever to become Supreme Justices, not all the judges, just as we would say all citizens of a State, not all the citizens of a State, for Article IV Section 2.

 

We may refer to Article II, Section 3:
The President shall commission all the officers of the United States.

 

There are also non-commissioned officers, in the USA.

 

Let us compare Article II, Section 2.
The President (…) shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law.

 

Following the classicist canon and saying,
The President (…) shall nominate, and (…) appoint the Judges of the Supreme Court, might imply that Supreme Judges could be changed even every four years.

 

As the President is a President in office, the Judges would be those to work during the term.

 

This never has been and is not likely to become the understanding of the law. The need for the Judiciary independence is one of the issues named in the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.
HE has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the Tenure of their Offices, and the Amount and Payment of their Salaries.”

 

We may note that the definite grammatical article, for Article III Section 1, as well as Article IV Section 2, comes with the beginning of the sentence, both in the parchment and John Carter print.
The Judges (…) shall hold their offices during good behavior…
The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities…

 

The matter looks that of the grammatical canon of the time, if we compare the generative phrasing of Article II, Section 2,
He shall (…) appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, or Article III Section 2, presented above.

 

For the Constitution generally, we can follow John Carter’s capitalization to quite an extent: Ambassadors and Consuls are members of the diplomatic corps, and Ministers are members of Executive bodies.

 

The Constitution does not name the army and navy as particular corps, but as two major designations for the armed Executive. However, the phrase “judges in every State” does not refer to a particular body, either.

 

*****

Prediction on procedures would encourage the definite article.

 

Let us mind not to mistake this prediction with PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE, as defined in psychology today. Quite another way round, procedural knowledge is defined as that we form by doing, and declarative lore is the talk we know on problem solving.

 

The Congress shall have power to provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States.

 

The Constitution has generative flexibility also with this regard, however. Article IV Section 4 says:
The United States shall guarantee, to every State in this Union, a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and, on application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.

 

Article V says:
The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution; or, on the application of the Legislatures of two-thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing amendments.

 

In Article V, the phrase the application refers to the specific context that precedes directly, that of proposing amendments.

 

Let us mind the cognitive regards, however. The First Amendment says,
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

 

If we said, the Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, we might hint at the other sets within US governmental powers, the Executive or Judiciary, to make such regulations.

 

The Amendment does not imply any such power.

 

We may recur to our idea for a semantic category: the notion people can be our semantic category for the people of the United States.

 

A category allows perception without redundancy. We do not need to refer to other objects of thought. We could say,
People are not animals.
Animals would be another, separate category.

 

We can think that categories allow making semantic heads. The use as Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, would have Congress for the semantic head, without reference to other governmental powers.

 

We may compare phrases as in Congress assembled, or during the session of Congress, where the context does not require reference to the Executive or Judiciary.

 

Our category might be legislation.

*****

Classic grammars may interpret the verb form “shall” for a “false imperative” or a word to express actually a resolve.

 

The Oxford Learners Dictionary says it is a Modal verb that shows we “are determined”, or we want “to give an order or instruction”.

 

We absolutely cannot believe that for American English.
The Constitution says,
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed.

 

Let us think how the story began. In British English, the word form “shall” actually belonged with monarchy, for quite a proportion of time.

 

Early Anglo-Saxon poetry would tell about “a king who shall win a queen”. To use the verb with the first person singular, that is, to say I shall, one had to be a royal or in the service. Otherwise, they were the “mad Bedlam”.

 

British commoners and other people, if they used the verb form “shall”, it was mostly with the third person, he, she, or it. For own resolves, the verb form “will” prevailed.

 

With American liberty and freedom, human ability to say I will grew stronger; the verb form “will” became fit for the third person, he, she, or it, to tell about high probability as well.

 

The verb form “shall” has become suppositive. In the Constitution, it belongs with contexts we also can think “if”, or “when the circumstance is”, too.

 

“Shall” became used to prefigure on matters already at the time the Constitution was written. This kind of thinking involves a default premise.

 

To interpret “crimes shall have been committed”, we assume the premise: if crimes become committed. The Constitutional clause — also common sense — is not a recommendation to commit a felony or crime.

 

The subjunctive along the verb form “shall” has become purely a matter of style, in modern American English.

 

The verb form anyway renders a supposition, and there is no king or queen figure psychologically to bind the third person — the classic canon continues to be forwarded without a premise — hence,
Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approves, he shall sign it.

 

The President’s signature is necessary as well as sufficient, to pass a law.

 

It is the Constitution itself to offer the use:
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside.
Part 4 of our Travel in Grammar may have more.

 

The style of noting on the date of the document, which included the phrase “year of our Lord”, is no longer in use for State legislation, and I keep it only in my replica of John Carter print.

 

Finally, the function word which has not gone out linguistic distribution in American English; in simple words, which remains in use, and the reference it makes compares well with that by the pronoun who. Therefore, there is no need to “modernize” the Constitution or amendments, replacing which with that.

 

Our use of that versus which is a matter of style, not grammatical correctness. We use the conjunction that, when it adds to clarity, and doubt might come mostly with speech. There is no ambiguity in the Constitution or amendments, the formal, written legislation.

 

Making a grammatical rule to require a replacement, we would have to apply it also to the pronoun who. A phrase as No person who shall not have attained to the age of twenty-five years, would have to be changed into No person that… Many speakers of the language might have such a requirement for redundant (as imposing a style), or even odd. In all languages, we interpret words in context, anyway.

 

Feel welcome to the portfolio.
GRAMMAR WEB LOG: PRINT-READY PORTFOLIO

 

US Constitution print by John Carter

John Carter printed the Constitution in 1787, following a resolve by the General Assembly for Rhode Island and Providence:

 

It is voted and resolved, that the report of the Convention, lately held at Philadelphia, proposing a new Constitution for the United States of America, be printed as soon as may be; that the following number of copies be sent to the several town clerks in the State, to be distributed among the inhabitants, that the freemen may have an opportunity of forming their sentiments of the said proposed Constitution.

 

His print can be viewed at the US Library of Congress.
LOC.GOV: JOHN CARTER PRINT.

 

JOHN CARTER PRINT ANNOTATED BY A TOWN CLERK IN EAST GREENWICH.

 

His manner to divide words might have been purposed to help discussion and quoting: except people’s names (where letter characters are spaced equally and as the column allows), the right brim of each column can help find matters of competence by the several States.

 

We can read in Thomas Paine, the Constitution is a Continental Charter to draw the line of business and jurisdiction between them (the States).

 

For example, at the word per-fect, the term union would deserve attention. My public domain portfolio has replicas of his print.
PUBLIC DOMAIN TRANSLATION:
JOHN CARTER REPLICAS
PICTURE: CARTER REPLICA

 

Poster replicas of the United States Constitution print by John Carter, exclusive of characters ſ and ∫ (s); font Adobe Caslon Pro 14pt, character spacing +0.7pt on average, kerning 14pt and above, indentation 8pt LEX (Latin for law, please see Perseus); line height 1; poster size 1687×2795 pixels; content width-to-height ratio approx. 65%, as in the original layout.

 

I used his layout to present the Constitution in modern American English. Feel welcome to the entire portfolio. It has source HTML files, to allow editing before print: I do not claim my presentation has to be perfect.
FREE, PUBLIC DOMAIN POSTERS — PORTFOLIO.

 

John Carter spelled “secrecy” as “ſecreſy”; “secresy” was a variant for “secrecy” at the time. “Controul” was a variant for “control”.

 

The print spelling “ensure” compares with “encrease”; the parchment spells “insure”. A document is more likely to insure than to ensure, in the sense of the word today, and this is my resolve for the content in modern American English.

 

However, the Latin word sensus never has been used for a census, spelled with a “c” in the parchment. I do not render the print error in my poster. Let us mind the print was done “soon as might be”.

 

Carter print also has spellings as “defence”, “behaviour”, or “honour”, nowadays associated with British English.

 

The change in American spellings was taking place already at the time of his print. We can compare The Declaration of Independence: it says “honor”. John Carter most probably did not want a dispute over spellings to distract people from the Constitutional matter at hand.

 

The Constitution parchment original

We can view the original document at the US National Archives.
ARCHIVES.GOV: CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

The parchment capitalizes nouns, that is, spells them with big initial letters, similarly to the Declaration of Independence. It does not capitalize adjectives.

 

Feel welcome to read about the Declaration of Independence, too.
TYPESCRIPT DATA

 

I present both the Declaration and the Constitution parchment in typescripts. A typescript renders the document sense and structural design, but not always the details of form. A transcript copies the document letter-for-letter.

 

The purpose of making a typescript rather than a transcript is to skip the clerk’s “slips of the pen”. There are only a few in the Constitution parchment, and the document shows mastery in the notation style generally.
We can see a transcript at the National Archives.
CONSTITUTION PARCHMENT TRANSCRIPT, US NATIONAL ARCHIVES

 

There is no need to keep the slips, to read and learn. The parchment has the common defence, enumeration, vacancies, the Executive Authority, removal from Office and disqualification, Office of honor, and a few more.

 

They might prove distracting, in language work.

 

We do not capitalize in phrases as from day to day or from time to time, as they are adverbials of time. We can compare the phrase in the mean time, in the Declaration.

 

The initial phrase, We, the People, does not have the comma in the calligraphic. John Cater print has it, and it would be everywhere in similar contexts, also in the times the Constitution was being written. I include it in the typescript.

 

Typescription is an up-to-date thing, therefore, the date format is adjusted. Source HTML allows change.

 

Feel welcome to my typescript
and source HTML.
PORTFOLIO: PARCHMENT TYPESCRIPT

 

PICTURE: PARCHMENT TYPESCRIPT PAGE 1, US CONSTITUTION POSTER

 

TYPESCRIPT POSTERS, US CONSTITUTION PARCHMENT
Typescript poster of the US Constitution parchment, pages 1-4; font: Great Vibes Open Type, font size 19pt on average; font spacing 1.5pt on average; kerning 1pt and above; indentation LEX (Latin for law).
Source HTML allows adjustments.
GOOGLE FONTS DIRECTORY
OPEN SOURCE FONT ATTRIBUTION
Installing fonts may influence the way websites display on your machine.
You may care to use SkyFonts.
GOOGLE FONTS DIALOG

 

USA legal thought and inspiration with Thomas Paine

The Declaration of Independence

Declaring American independence was legal. It would have been without the Declaration that the War of Independence might be termed a rebellion.

 

The Declaration:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

 

Thomas Paine:

Were a manifest to be published, and despatched to foreign courts, setting forth the miseries we have endured, and the peaceable methods we have ineffectually used for redress; declaring, at the same time, that not being able, any longer, to live happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the British court, we had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connections with her; at the same time, assuring all such courts of our peacable disposition towards them, and of our desire of entering into trade with them: Such a memorial would produce more good effects to this Continent, than if a ship were freighted with petitions to Britain.

 

Mankind being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance.

 

But there is another and greater distinction for which no truly natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is, the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. (…) As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of Scripture.

 

I offer the following extracts from that wise observer on governments, Dragonetti. “The science” says he “of the politician consists in fixing the true point of happiness and freedom. Those men would deserve the gratitude of ages, who should discover a mode of government that contained the greatest sum of individual happiness, with the least national expense.”

 

The Declaration:

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

 

Thomas Paine:

In short, monarchy and succession have laid (not this or that kingdom only) but the world in blood and ashes. ‘Tis a form of government which the word of God bears testimony against, and blood will attend it.

 

Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever FORM thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expence and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.

 

But the most powerful of all arguments, is, that nothing but independance, i. e. a Continental form of government, can keep the peace of the Continent and preserve it inviolate from civil wars.

 

 

The colonies have manifested such a spirit of good order and obedience to Continental government, as is sufficient to make every reasonable person easy and happy on that head.

 

 

Philadelphia Convention and Constitution

Thomas Paine:

A government of our own is our natural right: And when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human affairs, he will become convinced, that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a cool deliberate manner, while we have it in our power, than to trust such an interesting event to time and chance.

 

Let the assemblies be annual, with a President only. The representation more equal. Their business wholly domestic, and subject to the authority of a Continental Congress.

 

Let each colony be divided into six, eight, or ten, convenient districts, each district to send a proper number of delegates to Congress, so that each colony send at least thirty. The whole number in Congress will be least 390.

 

And in order that nothing may pass into a law but what is satisfactorily just, not less than three-fifths of the Congress to be called a majority (The argument overall being on the need for a large representation, TPelka).

 

But as there is a peculiar delicacy, from whom, or in what manner, this business must first arise, and as it seems most agreeable and consistent that it should come from some intermediate body between the governed and the governors, that is, between the Congress and the people, let a CONTINENTAL CONFERENCE be held, in the following manner, and for the following purpose.

 

A committee of twenty-six members of Congress, viz. two for each colony. Two members for each House of Assembly, or Provincial Convention; and five representatives of the people at large, to be chosen in the capital city or town of each province, for, and in behalf of the whole province, by as many qualified voters as shall think proper to attend from all parts of the province for that purpose; or, if more convenient, the representatives may be chosen in two or three of the most populous parts thereof. In this conference, thus assembled, will be united, the two grand principles of business, KNOWLEDGE and POWER. The members of Congress, Assemblies, or Conventions, by having had experience in national concerns, will be able and useful counsellors, and the whole, being impowered by the people, will have a truly legal authority.

 

The conferring members being met, let their business be to frame a CONTINENTAL CHARTER, or Charter of the United Colonies; (answering to what is called the Magna Charta of England) fixing the number and manner of choosing members of Congress, members of Assembly, with their date of sitting, and drawing the line of business and jurisdiction between them: (Always remembering, that our strength is Continental, not provincial:) Securing freedom and property to all men, and above all things, the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; with such other matter as is necessary for a charter to contain. Immediately after which, the said Conference to dissolve, and the bodies which shall be chosen comformable to the said charter, to be the legislators and governors of this Continent for the time being: Whose peace and happiness, may God preserve, Amen.

 

George Washington’s letter to the Continental Congress

George Washington:

It is obviously impracticable, in the federal government of these States, to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all. Individuals entering into society must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained.

 

Thomas Paine:

For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of two evils to choose the least. (The use here is to denote: in other cases, too; TPelka)

 

The object, contended for, ought always to bear some just proportion to the expense.

 

George Washington:

In all our deliberations on this subject, we kept steadily in our view that which appears to us the greatest interest of every true American, the consolidation of our Union, in which are involved our prosperity, felicity, safety, perhaps our national existence.

 

Thomas Paine:

It is not in numbers, but in unity, that our great strength lies; yet our present numbers are sufficient to repel the force of all the world. The Continent hath, at this time, the largest body of armed and disciplined men of any power under Heaven; and is just arrived at that pitch of strength, in which, no single colony is able to support itself, and the whole, when united, can accomplish the matter.

Thomas Paine, COMMON SENSE.

Feel welcome to my
PUBLIC DOMAIN TRANSLATION INTO POLISH.

 

The making of the Constitution

The word CONSTITUTION comes from the Latin CONSTITUTO, I set out, establish. In ancient times, “constitutions” were edicts issued by mostly despotic rulers. The ancients happened to incise those notices in stone, as there was no print.

 

When a ruler or authority wanted to change an ordnance, he or she ordered another stone carved. Nowadays, only some researchers would use the word “constitution” for an ancient decree as the Roman Twelve Tables.

 

The Tables are speculated to have had rules for ancient plebeians to memorize. We are more dignified than mere memorization, in our language journey. Grammatical work with the text can help remember it really well.EMOTICON: SMILE

 

Initially, the States had the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION AND PERPETUAL UNION. They were adopted in 1777, yet became ratified by all thirteen states in 1781. The Articles failed to help manage the economy and other federal matters.

 

However, the Revolutionary War was not ended yet. It was after American freedom from England became affirmed in the TREATY OF PARIS, in 1783, there was more time to think about a government for the country.

 

The CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ― also known as the Philadelphia Convention, or the Federal Convention ― began in 1787. The Constitution came into power in 1789. Rhode Island ratified the Constitution in 1790, as the last of the initial 13 States.

 

The American Constitution is the longest-lived constitution in the world. It allows improvement. Feel welcome to the
BILL OF RIGHTS AND FURTHER AMENDMENTS.

 

PICTURE: SIGNING THE CONSTITUTION, HOWARD CHANDLER CHRISTYSCENE AT THE SIGNING OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, BY HOWARD CHANDLER CHRISTY; VIEW OVER WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.